You're right, there is a cause for alarm even if they weren't nukes they were still large bombs that Sadaam shouldn't have.
wtf??? large bombs that he shouldn't have = justification for the death of even one US soldier??? i think NOT...
and his means for delivering said "large bombs" to anywhere within the united states was what???
saddam was not a threat to the united states, and there was virtually no terrorist activity in that country compared to what there is after we occupied it...
ok, so we agree saddam was bad... but whats the reasoning behind diverting so much of our military from the real war on terror???
and the threat from saddam still pales in comparision to that of bin laden...
lets not forget who really attacked the us